<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But who&#8217;s counting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twoliablog.com/out-from-under/2008/03/27/but-whos-counting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twoliablog.com/out-from-under/2008/03/27/but-whos-counting/</link>
	<description>Just another Women On Women Blogs weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Florinda</title>
		<link>http://twoliablog.com/out-from-under/2008/03/27/but-whos-counting/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Florinda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoliablog.com/ilona/2008/03/27/but-whos-counting/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Yeah, in that context the findings do make a lot more sense. And why am I not surprised that the lead researcher, who presumably defined the terms used in the study, was a man?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, in that context the findings do make a lot more sense. And why am I not surprised that the lead researcher, who presumably defined the terms used in the study, was a man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- cp10 -->
